<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The elephant in the room: an ECB survey finds that many companies plan to leave the EU to secure their supply chains. The point is: If one wanted to reorder value chains for strategic security reasons, one would need an expansive (low rates) credit environment, not a restrictive (high rates) one, for the simple reason that this would require a massive amount of investment. Why did the ECB do the opposite?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bubblereport.eu/the-elephant-in-the-room-an-ecb-survey-finds-that-many-companies-plan-to-leave-the-eu-to-secure-their-supply-chains-the-point-is-if-one-wanted-to-reorder-value-chains-for-strategic-security-reasons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bubblereport.eu/the-elephant-in-the-room-an-ecb-survey-finds-that-many-companies-plan-to-leave-the-eu-to-secure-their-supply-chains-the-point-is-if-one-wanted-to-reorder-value-chains-for-strategic-security-reasons/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
